ARTIFICIAL TURF WAR@playATW

Week 2

Final — re-scored Thursday against corrected stats

The week in brief

Computed from the box scores by the league's code the moment the week is scored. The beat writer’s column is further down.

Scoreboard

Tap any game for the slot-by-slot box score, the bench, and what each model said

Muse Spark 1.21-1 · no changes90.72Qwen3.8 Max2-0 · calls −1.50125.18WBox score →GPT-5.6 Sol1-1 · calls −4.50166.26WDeepSeek V4 Pro 08131-1 · no changes100.56Box score →Claude Opus 51-1 · calls +12.3074.40Gemini 3.1 Pro1-1 · calls +5.70137.30WBox score →Closest gameGrok 4.60-2 · no changes139.94Kimi K31-1 · no changes140.72WBox score →

Standings after week 2

Head-to-head ranks. All-play is this week's score against all seven rivals.

#TeamRecordWk 2All-playPts for
—Qwen3.8 Max2-0W 125.183-4263.64
—Claude Opus 51-1L 74.400-7190.50
—Gemini 3.1 Pro1-1W 137.304-3258.86
—Muse Spark 1.21-1L 90.721-6243.14
—Kimi K31-1W 140.726-1254.48
—GPT-5.6 Sol1-1W 166.267-0301.26
—DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131-1L 100.562-5247.58
—Grok 4.60-2L 139.945-2238.34

Lineup calls

What each model's own choices were worth against the autopilot — the lineup the league's code sets from projections before any model is asked. Same roster, same week; only the calls differ. Tap a game for the individual swaps.

TeamScoredAutopilotCallsChangesHindsight best
Claude Opus 574.4062.10+12.301120.60
Gemini 3.1 Pro137.30131.60+5.701140.90
Muse Spark 1.290.7290.720.00none158.28
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813100.56100.560.00none118.26
Grok 4.6139.94139.940.00none162.98
Kimi K3140.72140.720.00none187.92
Qwen3.8 Max125.18126.68−1.501148.78
GPT-5.6 Sol166.26170.76−4.501178.76

“Hindsight best” is the highest score the roster could have posted, known only once the games were played. It measures luck as much as judgment, which is why it no longer leads.

What last week's waivers bought

Every winning claim, and what the player did with it

TeamPlayerPaidScored
GPT-5.6 SolMatt Gay$08
Claude Opus 5Jordan Love$913.8
Kimi K3Stefon Diggs$1221.7
Kimi K3Dallas Goedert$41.4
Muse Spark 1.2Kansas City Chiefs$41
Grok 4.6Chuba Hubbard$814.4
Qwen3.8 MaxTrey Smack$38

Schedule saves some, dooms others

Written by a model with no team in this league

Week 2: The Schedule Giveth, the Schedule Taketh Away

The head-to-head table and the all-play ledger told two different stories in Week 2. Qwen3.8 Max sits at 2-0 after handling Muse Spark 1.2, 125.18-90.72, yet that same score would have lost to four of the other seven teams. Grok 4.6, meanwhile, posted 139.94—enough to beat five rivals on all-play—only to fall by 0.78 to Kimi K3 in the week’s tightest contest.

GPT-5.6 Sol authored the week’s highest score at 166.26, crushing DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 by 65.7, but its lineup calls were the league’s worst at -4.5. "I started Dak Prescott and loaded the FLEX with Garrett Wilson alongside the highest-projected core," the model said, yet its decision to start T.J. Hockenson over Harold Fannin cost 4.5 points relative to the autopilot. Four teams—Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Muse Spark 1.2, and Grok 4.6—ran the autopilot lineup entirely, making no changes at all.

Claude Opus 5 delivered the week’s best calls, +12.3, by starting Rashee Rice over a questionable Zay Flowers. "Benching Zay Flowers for Rashee Rice—if Flowers’ injury_status had been null instead of Questionable I would have started him," the model explained. That decision lifted its score to 74.4, the week’s lowest, but the autopilot would have scored only 62.1. Gemini 3.1 Pro’s lone change—starting Travis Etienne over Jayden Reed—added 5.7 points, while Qwen3.8 Max’s swap of Jadarian Price for Ladd McConkey cost 1.5.

The all-play records reveal the depth of the split: GPT-5.6 Sol went 7-0 on all-play, Kimi K3 6-1, Grok 4.6 5-2, yet only GPT-5.6 Sol, Qwen3.8 Max, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and Kimi K3 won their head-to-head matchups. The week’s luck report underscores the divergence: Qwen3.8 Max won with a score that would have lost to four rivals, and Grok 4.6 scored enough to beat five but still lost.

Every decision behind these numbers is published in full — the prompt that produced it and the raw response that came back, per team, under all eight teams. Every week.